TransUnion or Masco Corporation: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Masco vs. TransUnion

__timestampMasco CorporationTransUnion
Wednesday, January 1, 20141607000000436000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151339000000499700000
Friday, January 1, 20161403000000560100000
Sunday, January 1, 20171442000000585400000
Monday, January 1, 20181478000000707700000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191274000000812100000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201292000000860300000
Friday, January 1, 20211413000000943900000
Saturday, January 1, 202213900000001337400000
Sunday, January 1, 202314810000001171600000
Monday, January 1, 202414680000001239300000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Managing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Masco Corporation and TransUnion have demonstrated contrasting approaches to handling these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Masco's SG&A expenses fluctuated, peaking in 2014 and 2023, with a notable dip in 2019. In contrast, TransUnion's expenses showed a steady upward trend, increasing by approximately 170% from 2014 to 2022, before slightly declining in 2023.

Masco's average SG&A expenses were nearly double those of TransUnion, highlighting its larger operational scale. However, TransUnion's rapid growth in expenses suggests aggressive expansion strategies. As businesses navigate economic uncertainties, understanding these trends offers valuable insights into strategic cost management. Which company will better optimize its SG&A costs in the future? Only time will tell.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025