Verisk Analytics, Inc. or China Eastern Airlines Corporation Limited: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Verisk vs. China Eastern Airlines

__timestampChina Eastern Airlines Corporation LimitedVerisk Analytics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20144120000000227306000
Thursday, January 1, 20153651000000312690000
Friday, January 1, 20163133000000301600000
Sunday, January 1, 20173294000000322800000
Monday, January 1, 20183807000000378700000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194134000000603500000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201570000000413900000
Friday, January 1, 20211128000000422700000
Saturday, January 1, 20222933000000381500000
Sunday, January 1, 20237254000000389300000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

SG&A Cost Management: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. This analysis compares Verisk Analytics, Inc. and China Eastern Airlines Corporation Limited over a decade, from 2014 to 2023.

Verisk Analytics, Inc.: A Model of Consistency

Verisk Analytics has demonstrated remarkable consistency in managing its SG&A costs. With an average annual expense of approximately $375 million, Verisk's expenses have remained stable, peaking at $603 million in 2019. This stability reflects a disciplined approach to cost management, crucial for maintaining profitability in the data analytics sector.

China Eastern Airlines: Navigating Turbulent Skies

In contrast, China Eastern Airlines has faced more volatility. Their SG&A expenses averaged around $3.5 billion annually, with a significant spike to $7.25 billion in 2023. This fluctuation highlights the challenges airlines face, especially during economic downturns and global disruptions.

In conclusion, while Verisk Analytics showcases steady cost control, China Eastern Airlines' expenses reflect the dynamic nature of the aviation industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025