Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? AbbVie Inc. or Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: AbbVie vs. Walgreens

__timestampAbbVie Inc.Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014772400000017691000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015638700000021669000000
Friday, January 1, 2016585500000023425000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017627500000023618000000
Monday, January 1, 2018739900000024638000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019694200000023183000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201129900000022836000000
Friday, January 1, 20211234900000023798000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221526000000024994000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231287200000025479000000
Monday, January 1, 202428113000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical and retail sectors, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, AbbVie Inc. and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs.

From 2014 to 2023, AbbVie Inc. has shown a significant increase in SG&A expenses, rising by approximately 66%, from $7.7 billion to $12.9 billion. This upward trend reflects AbbVie's strategic investments in expanding its market presence and enhancing operational efficiencies. In contrast, Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. has maintained a relatively stable SG&A expense profile, with a modest increase of around 44% over the same period, reaching $25.5 billion in 2023.

While AbbVie focuses on aggressive growth, Walgreens emphasizes cost stability, showcasing two distinct approaches to financial management in their respective industries.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025