Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. or Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Pharma Giants: Who Masters SG&A Costs?

__timestampACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20143274800024419536
Thursday, January 1, 20159080400034718089
Friday, January 1, 201618645600040998209
Sunday, January 1, 201725506200032022880
Monday, January 1, 201826575800019110051
Tuesday, January 1, 201932563800026556257
Wednesday, January 1, 202038866100052275890
Friday, January 1, 202139602800080981000
Saturday, January 1, 2022369090000124431000
Sunday, January 1, 202340246600090932000
Monday, January 1, 202498761000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Pharmaceuticals

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have taken different paths in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, ACADIA's SG&A expenses surged by over 1,100%, peaking at approximately $402 million in 2023. In contrast, Arrowhead's expenses grew more modestly, increasing by around 270% to nearly $91 million in the same period.

While ACADIA's aggressive spending might indicate a robust expansion strategy, Arrowhead's more conservative approach suggests a focus on cost efficiency. Notably, Arrowhead's expenses in 2022 were just 25% of ACADIA's, highlighting a stark difference in financial strategies. As we look to the future, the missing data for 2024 leaves room for speculation on how these companies will continue to navigate their financial landscapes.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025