Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Intel Corporation

AMD vs. Intel: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.Intel Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20145990000008136000000
Thursday, January 1, 20154820000007930000000
Friday, January 1, 20164660000008397000000
Sunday, January 1, 20175160000007474000000
Monday, January 1, 20185620000006750000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20197500000006150000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20209950000006180000000
Friday, January 1, 202114480000006543000000
Saturday, January 1, 202223360000007002000000
Sunday, January 1, 202323520000005634000000
Monday, January 1, 202427830000005507000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? AMD vs. Intel

In the competitive world of semiconductors, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. From 2014 to 2023, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) and Intel Corporation have shown contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs. AMD's SG&A expenses have surged by nearly 300%, from approximately $599 million in 2014 to $2.35 billion in 2023. This increase reflects AMD's aggressive growth strategy and market expansion efforts. In contrast, Intel's SG&A expenses have decreased by about 31%, from $8.14 billion in 2014 to $5.63 billion in 2023, indicating a focus on cost efficiency and operational optimization. This divergence highlights the different paths these tech giants have taken in response to market dynamics. As AMD invests heavily in growth, Intel's cost-cutting measures may provide a competitive edge in maintaining profitability.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025