Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Seagate Technology Holdings plc

AMD vs. Seagate: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Wednesday, January 1, 2014599000000722000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015482000000857000000
Friday, January 1, 2016466000000635000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017516000000606000000
Monday, January 1, 2018562000000562000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019750000000453000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020995000000473000000
Friday, January 1, 20211448000000502000000
Saturday, January 1, 20222336000000559000000
Sunday, January 1, 20232352000000491000000
Monday, January 1, 20242783000000460000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Tech Giants

In the competitive world of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) and Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) have taken different paths in this regard over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, AMD's SG&A expenses surged by nearly 300%, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy and market expansion. In contrast, Seagate's expenses decreased by approximately 32%, showcasing its focus on cost efficiency and operational optimization.

A Decade of Change

AMD's expenses peaked in 2023, while Seagate consistently reduced its costs, reaching its lowest in 2024. This divergence highlights AMD's investment in innovation and market share, whereas Seagate emphasizes lean operations. As the tech landscape evolves, these strategies will shape their competitive edge and financial health.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025