Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc. or Travere Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotech Giants: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

__timestampAlpine Immune Sciences, Inc.Travere Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014228770959644696
Thursday, January 1, 2015684400079541000
Friday, January 1, 2016858600098015000
Sunday, January 1, 20176079000103958000
Monday, January 1, 20188362000103654000
Tuesday, January 1, 20199467000128951000
Wednesday, January 1, 202010899000135799000
Friday, January 1, 202114560000149883000
Saturday, January 1, 202217968000220206000
Sunday, January 1, 202322222000265542000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotech Companies

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc. and Travere Therapeutics, Inc. have taken different paths in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Alpine Immune Sciences saw a nearly tenfold increase in SG&A expenses, starting from a modest $2.3 million to $22.2 million. Meanwhile, Travere Therapeutics experienced a more than fourfold rise, from $59.6 million to $265.5 million.

Despite Travere's higher absolute expenses, their growth rate in SG&A costs was slower compared to Alpine's. This suggests a more controlled expansion strategy. Investors and industry analysts should consider these trends when evaluating the operational efficiency and strategic direction of these companies. Understanding how each company manages its SG&A expenses can provide insights into their long-term sustainability and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025