Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or Perrigo Company plc

SG&A Cost Management: Amneal vs. Perrigo

__timestampAmneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Perrigo Company plc
Wednesday, January 1, 201484615000675200000
Thursday, January 1, 2015109679000771800000
Friday, January 1, 20161187570001205500000
Sunday, January 1, 20171090460001146500000
Monday, January 1, 20182304350001125800000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192895980001166100000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203267270001175500000
Friday, January 1, 20213655040001111400000
Saturday, January 1, 20223997000001210100000
Sunday, January 1, 20234296750001274600000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Perrigo Company plc have taken different paths in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Amneal's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 408%, starting from a modest $84.6 million to a substantial $429.7 million. In contrast, Perrigo's expenses increased by about 89%, from $675.2 million to $1.27 billion.

While Perrigo's absolute expenses are higher, their growth rate is more controlled compared to Amneal. This suggests that Perrigo might be more efficient in managing their SG&A costs relative to their size. As the pharmaceutical industry continues to evolve, these companies' strategies in cost management will be pivotal in maintaining their competitive edge.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025