Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or Soleno Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotech Giants: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampArrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Soleno Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014244195362917513
Thursday, January 1, 2015347180897878291
Friday, January 1, 2016409982098366794
Sunday, January 1, 2017320228806610381
Monday, January 1, 2018191100516556000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019265562576930000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020522758908758000
Friday, January 1, 20218098100010806000
Saturday, January 1, 20221244310009844000
Sunday, January 1, 20239093200013481000
Monday, January 1, 202498761000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotech Firms

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts. Over the past decade, Arrowhead's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 300%, peaking in 2022. This reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. In contrast, Soleno Therapeutics has maintained a more stable SG&A trajectory, with expenses increasing by about 360% from 2014 to 2023. Notably, Soleno's expenses are consistently lower, suggesting a leaner operational model. However, the absence of data for Soleno in 2024 leaves room for speculation. As these companies navigate the biotech landscape, their differing approaches to SG&A optimization highlight the strategic choices that can define success.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025