Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? AstraZeneca PLC or Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

AstraZeneca vs. Neurocrine: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampAstraZeneca PLCNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141332400000017986000
Thursday, January 1, 20151145100000032480000
Friday, January 1, 2016973900000068081000
Sunday, January 1, 201710543000000169906000
Monday, January 1, 201810362000000248932000
Tuesday, January 1, 201911848000000354100000
Wednesday, January 1, 202011693000000433300000
Friday, January 1, 202115680000000583300000
Saturday, January 1, 202218955000000752700000
Sunday, January 1, 202318025000000887600000
Monday, January 1, 2024205320000001007200000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A Costs: AstraZeneca vs. Neurocrine Biosciences

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, AstraZeneca PLC and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost optimization. From 2014 to 2023, AstraZeneca's SG&A expenses have fluctuated, peaking at approximately $18 billion in 2022, reflecting a strategic investment in growth and market expansion. In contrast, Neurocrine Biosciences has maintained a more conservative approach, with expenses rising steadily from $18 million in 2014 to nearly $890 million in 2023, indicating a focus on controlled scaling.

AstraZeneca's expenses are roughly 20 times higher than Neurocrine's, highlighting their expansive operational scale. However, Neurocrine's consistent growth in SG&A spending suggests a deliberate strategy to enhance operational efficiency. This comparison underscores the diverse strategies employed by pharmaceutical giants in optimizing operational costs.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025