Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. or Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

BioMarin vs. Madrigal: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampBioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201430215600015746000
Thursday, January 1, 201540227100013392000
Friday, January 1, 20164765930009290000
Sunday, January 1, 20175543360007672000
Monday, January 1, 201860435300015293000
Tuesday, January 1, 201968092400022648000
Wednesday, January 1, 202073766900021864000
Friday, January 1, 202175937500037318000
Saturday, January 1, 202285400900048130000
Sunday, January 1, 2023937300000108146000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Pharmaceuticals

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. and Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have taken distinct paths in optimizing these costs.

BioMarin, a leader in the biopharmaceutical industry, has seen its SG&A expenses grow steadily, reaching a peak in 2023. This represents a threefold increase since 2014, reflecting their expansive growth strategy. In contrast, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, a smaller player, has maintained a more conservative approach. Their SG&A expenses, while increasing, remain significantly lower, peaking at just over 10% of BioMarin's 2023 expenses.

This divergence highlights the strategic choices companies make in balancing growth with cost efficiency. As the pharmaceutical landscape evolves, these strategies will play a pivotal role in determining long-term success.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025