Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation or Avery Dennison Corporation

SG&A Cost Management: Booz Allen vs. Avery Dennison

__timestampAvery Dennison CorporationBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201411553000002229642000
Thursday, January 1, 201511081000002159439000
Friday, January 1, 201610975000002319592000
Sunday, January 1, 201711232000002568511000
Monday, January 1, 201811275000002719909000
Tuesday, January 1, 201910804000002932602000
Wednesday, January 1, 202010605000003334378000
Friday, January 1, 202112485000003362722000
Saturday, January 1, 202213308000003633150000
Sunday, January 1, 202311779000004341769000
Monday, January 1, 202414153000001281443000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Corporations

In the competitive world of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. From 2014 to 2023, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Avery Dennison Corporation have showcased distinct strategies in optimizing these costs. Booz Allen Hamilton's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 95%, peaking in 2023, while Avery Dennison's expenses have seen a modest increase of about 2% over the same period. This stark contrast highlights Booz Allen's aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities, whereas Avery Dennison has maintained a more stable cost structure. Notably, 2024 data for Avery Dennison is missing, leaving room for speculation on their future strategy. As businesses navigate economic uncertainties, these insights into SG&A management offer valuable lessons in balancing growth with cost efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025