Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Broadcom Inc. or Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

Broadcom vs. Monolithic Power: SG&A Cost Strategies Compared

__timestampBroadcom Inc.Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201440700000066755000
Thursday, January 1, 201548600000072312000
Friday, January 1, 201680600000083012000
Sunday, January 1, 201779900000097257000
Monday, January 1, 20181056000000113803000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191709000000133542000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201935000000161670000
Friday, January 1, 20211347000000226190000
Saturday, January 1, 20221382000000273595000
Sunday, January 1, 20231592000000275740000
Monday, January 1, 20244959000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Broadcom Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. have taken different paths in this regard over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Broadcom's SG&A expenses have surged by over 290%, peaking in 2024 with a notable increase. In contrast, Monolithic Power Systems has maintained a more consistent growth, with expenses rising by approximately 313% over the same period. This divergence highlights Broadcom's aggressive expansion strategy, while Monolithic Power Systems focuses on steady growth. The data for 2024 is incomplete for Monolithic Power Systems, indicating a potential shift or strategic change. As these companies navigate the ever-evolving tech landscape, their approach to SG&A optimization will be pivotal in determining their future success.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025