Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Catalent, Inc. or Perrigo Company plc

Catalent vs. Perrigo: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampCatalent, Inc.Perrigo Company plc
Wednesday, January 1, 2014334800000675200000
Thursday, January 1, 2015337300000771800000
Friday, January 1, 20163581000001205500000
Sunday, January 1, 20174026000001146500000
Monday, January 1, 20184626000001125800000
Tuesday, January 1, 20195120000001166100000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205779000001175500000
Friday, January 1, 20216870000001111400000
Saturday, January 1, 20228440000001210100000
Sunday, January 1, 20238310000001274600000
Monday, January 1, 2024935000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Catalent, Inc. and Perrigo Company plc, two industry giants, have shown distinct approaches to optimizing these costs over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Catalent, Inc. has seen a steady increase in SG&A expenses, rising by approximately 179%, reflecting their aggressive expansion and investment strategies. In contrast, Perrigo Company plc's SG&A expenses have increased by about 89% over the same period, indicating a more conservative approach.

While Catalent's expenses peaked in 2024, Perrigo's data for that year remains unavailable, leaving room for speculation on their strategic moves. This comparison highlights the diverse strategies companies employ to balance growth and cost management, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025