Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Exelixis, Inc. or Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Exelixis vs. Amphastar: SG&A Cost Strategies Compared

__timestampAmphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Exelixis, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20144037300050829000
Thursday, January 1, 20154697400057305000
Friday, January 1, 201647298000116145000
Sunday, January 1, 201750918000159362000
Monday, January 1, 201858044000206366000
Tuesday, January 1, 201963109000228244000
Wednesday, January 1, 202065157000293355000
Friday, January 1, 202168920000401715000
Saturday, January 1, 202266592000459856000
Sunday, January 1, 202380393000542705000
Monday, January 1, 2024492128000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biopharma Companies

In the competitive world of biopharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. From 2014 to 2023, Exelixis, Inc. and Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have shown contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management. Exelixis, Inc. has seen a significant increase in SG&A expenses, rising from approximately $51 million in 2014 to over $542 million in 2023, marking a tenfold increase. This surge reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in growth. In contrast, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has maintained a more stable SG&A expense profile, with a modest increase from around $40 million to $80 million over the same period, doubling their costs. This stability suggests a more conservative approach, focusing on efficiency and cost control. As investors and industry analysts evaluate these strategies, the question remains: which approach will yield better long-term returns?

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025