Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Exelixis, Inc. or Cytokinetics, Incorporated

Biotech Giants: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampCytokinetics, IncorporatedExelixis, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141726800050829000
Thursday, January 1, 20151966700057305000
Friday, January 1, 201627823000116145000
Sunday, January 1, 201736468000159362000
Monday, January 1, 201831282000206366000
Tuesday, January 1, 201939610000228244000
Wednesday, January 1, 202052820000293355000
Friday, January 1, 202196803000401715000
Saturday, January 1, 2022177977000459856000
Sunday, January 1, 2023173612000542705000
Monday, January 1, 2024492128000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, Exelixis, Inc. and Cytokinetics, Incorporated have taken different paths in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Exelixis consistently spent more on SG&A, peaking at approximately $543 million in 2023, a staggering 10-fold increase from 2014. In contrast, Cytokinetics saw a more moderate rise, with expenses reaching around $174 million in 2023, a tenfold increase from 2014. This divergence highlights Exelixis's aggressive growth strategy, while Cytokinetics maintains a more conservative approach. Understanding these trends offers valuable insights into each company's operational priorities and strategic focus. As the biotech industry evolves, monitoring SG&A expenses will remain a key indicator of a company's ability to balance growth with cost efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025