Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Gilead Sciences, Inc. or Incyte Corporation

Gilead vs. Incyte: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampGilead Sciences, Inc.Incyte Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20142983000000165772000
Thursday, January 1, 20153426000000196614000
Friday, January 1, 20163398000000303251000
Sunday, January 1, 20173878000000366406000
Monday, January 1, 20184056000000434407000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194381000000468711000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205151000000516922000
Friday, January 1, 20215246000000739560000
Saturday, January 1, 202256730000001002140000
Sunday, January 1, 202360900000001161300000
Monday, January 1, 202460910000001242157000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Incyte Corporation have demonstrated contrasting strategies in this area. From 2014 to 2023, Gilead's SG&A expenses surged by over 100%, peaking at $6.09 billion in 2023. In contrast, Incyte's expenses grew at a more modest pace, increasing by approximately 600% to reach $1.16 billion in the same year.

While Gilead's larger scale might justify its higher expenses, Incyte's leaner approach could indicate a more efficient cost management strategy. This divergence highlights the different paths companies can take in optimizing operational costs, with Gilead focusing on expansive growth and Incyte prioritizing cost efficiency. As the biotech industry evolves, these strategies will continue to shape the financial landscapes of these two giants.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025