Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Graco Inc. or AECOM

SG&A Cost Management: AECOM vs. Graco Inc. Over a Decade

__timestampAECOMGraco Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201480908000303565000
Thursday, January 1, 2015113975000324016000
Friday, January 1, 2016115088000341734000
Sunday, January 1, 2017133309000372496000
Monday, January 1, 2018135787000382988000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019148123000367743000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020188535000355796000
Friday, January 1, 2021155072000422975000
Saturday, January 1, 2022147309000404731000
Sunday, January 1, 2023153575000432156000
Monday, January 1, 2024160105000465133000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: AECOM vs. Graco Inc.

In the competitive landscape of corporate finance, optimizing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. AECOM and Graco Inc., two industry giants, have shown distinct strategies in managing these costs over the past decade. From 2014 to 2024, AECOM's SG&A expenses have increased by approximately 98%, while Graco Inc. has seen a rise of about 53%. This suggests that Graco Inc. may have a more effective cost management strategy, maintaining a steadier growth in expenses relative to revenue. Notably, in 2020, AECOM's expenses peaked, reflecting a challenging year, possibly due to global economic shifts. Meanwhile, Graco Inc. consistently managed its costs, with a notable increase in 2023, indicating strategic investments. As businesses navigate economic uncertainties, these insights into SG&A optimization offer valuable lessons in financial stewardship.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025