Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. or Merus N.V.

Biotech Giants: Halozyme vs. Merus in SG&A Cost Management

__timestampHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc.Merus N.V.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014359420003852327
Thursday, January 1, 201540028000839656
Friday, January 1, 2016458530004478145
Sunday, January 1, 20175381600016432324
Monday, January 1, 20186080400011890871
Tuesday, January 1, 20197725200034110000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204573600035781000
Friday, January 1, 20215032300040896000
Saturday, January 1, 202214352600052200000
Sunday, January 1, 202314918200059836000
Monday, January 1, 2024154335000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for sustaining growth and profitability. Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and Merus N.V. have been navigating this financial landscape since 2014. Over the past decade, Halozyme has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 315%, peaking in 2023. In contrast, Merus N.V. has managed a more modest increase of around 145% over the same period.

Halozyme's expenses surged notably in 2022, reaching nearly 2.5 times their 2014 levels, while Merus N.V. maintained a steadier trajectory. This divergence highlights different strategic approaches: Halozyme's aggressive expansion versus Merus's cautious scaling. As investors and industry watchers analyze these trends, the question remains: which strategy will yield better long-term returns? The data suggests that while both companies are growing, their paths to optimizing SG&A costs are distinct.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025