Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Honeywell International Inc. or Clean Harbors, Inc.

SG&A Cost Optimization: Honeywell vs. Clean Harbors

__timestampClean Harbors, Inc.Honeywell International Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20144379210005518000000
Thursday, January 1, 20154141640005006000000
Friday, January 1, 20164220150005469000000
Sunday, January 1, 20174566480005808000000
Monday, January 1, 20185037470006051000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194840540005519000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204510440004772000000
Friday, January 1, 20215379620004798000000
Saturday, January 1, 20226273910005214000000
Sunday, January 1, 20236711610004657000000
Monday, January 1, 20247396290005466000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of industrial giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Honeywell International Inc. and Clean Harbors, Inc. have been at the forefront of this financial balancing act since 2014. Over the past decade, Honeywell's SG&A expenses have shown a downward trend, decreasing by approximately 16% from 2014 to 2023. In contrast, Clean Harbors has seen a significant increase of around 53% in the same period.

This divergence highlights Honeywell's strategic cost optimization, while Clean Harbors' rising expenses may reflect growth investments. As of 2023, Honeywell's SG&A expenses stand at about 4.7 billion, whereas Clean Harbors' expenses have reached approximately 671 million. This comparison underscores the different financial strategies employed by these industry leaders, offering valuable insights into their operational efficiencies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025