Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Howmet Aerospace Inc. or Global Payments Inc.

SG&A Cost Efficiency: Howmet vs. Global Payments

__timestampGlobal Payments Inc.Howmet Aerospace Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141295014000770000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151325567000765000000
Friday, January 1, 20161411096000947000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171488258000731000000
Monday, January 1, 20181534297000604000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192046672000704000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202878878000277000000
Friday, January 1, 20213391161000251000000
Saturday, January 1, 20223524578000288000000
Sunday, January 1, 20234073768000343000000
Monday, January 1, 20244285307000362000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. This analysis compares Howmet Aerospace Inc. and Global Payments Inc. over a decade, from 2014 to 2023, to see who optimizes these costs better.

Global Payments Inc. has seen a significant increase in SG&A expenses, rising by over 200% from 2014 to 2023. This growth reflects their aggressive expansion strategy, but it also raises questions about cost efficiency. In contrast, Howmet Aerospace Inc. has managed to reduce its SG&A expenses by approximately 55% over the same period, showcasing a disciplined approach to cost management.

While Global Payments Inc. focuses on scaling, Howmet Aerospace Inc. emphasizes efficiency. This divergence highlights the strategic choices companies make in balancing growth and cost control, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025