Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. or Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated

Biotech Giants: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

__timestampCorcept Therapeutics IncorporatedIntra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20143491600010337679
Thursday, January 1, 20153694900018187286
Friday, January 1, 20164524000024758063
Sunday, January 1, 20176241600023666957
Monday, January 1, 20188128900030099855
Tuesday, January 1, 201910035900064947625
Wednesday, January 1, 2020105326000186363444
Friday, January 1, 2021122356000272611040
Saturday, January 1, 2022152848000358782000
Sunday, January 1, 2023184259000409864000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotech Companies

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. and Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated have taken different paths in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Intra-Cellular Therapies saw a staggering increase in SG&A expenses, growing nearly 40 times from 2014 to 2023. Meanwhile, Corcept Therapeutics experienced a more moderate rise, with expenses increasing by approximately 5 times over the same period.

This divergence highlights contrasting strategies: Intra-Cellular Therapies may be investing heavily in growth and expansion, while Corcept Therapeutics appears to be maintaining a more controlled cost structure. As the biotech industry continues to evolve, these strategies will play a pivotal role in shaping each company's future success.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025