Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc or CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Jazz vs. CymaBay

__timestampCymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc
Wednesday, January 1, 20148185000406114000
Thursday, January 1, 20158871000449119000
Friday, January 1, 20169645000502892000
Sunday, January 1, 201712387000544156000
Monday, January 1, 201814381000683530000
Tuesday, January 1, 201919238000736942000
Wednesday, January 1, 202017425000854233000
Friday, January 1, 2021230400001451683000
Saturday, January 1, 2022251160001416967000
Sunday, January 1, 2023519530001343105000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. have taken different paths in this regard over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Jazz Pharmaceuticals consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $1.45 billion in 2021. This represents a staggering 257% increase from their 2014 expenses. In contrast, CymaBay Therapeutics, while operating on a smaller scale, saw a more modest increase of around 535% over the same period, reaching $51.95 million in 2023.

While Jazz's larger scale might justify its higher expenses, CymaBay's leaner approach could indicate a more efficient cost management strategy. As the pharmaceutical landscape evolves, these companies' ability to optimize SG&A costs will be pivotal in maintaining their competitive edge.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025