Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Johnson & Johnson or Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc

SG&A Cost Management: J&J vs. Jazz Pharmaceuticals

__timestampJazz Pharmaceuticals plcJohnson & Johnson
Wednesday, January 1, 201440611400021954000000
Thursday, January 1, 201544911900021203000000
Friday, January 1, 201650289200019945000000
Sunday, January 1, 201754415600021420000000
Monday, January 1, 201868353000022540000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201973694200022178000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202085423300022084000000
Friday, January 1, 2021145168300020118000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022141696700019046000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023134310500020112000000
Monday, January 1, 202421969000000
ngram

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Johnson & Johnson and Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc have taken different paths in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Johnson & Johnson consistently maintained SG&A expenses around 20 billion USD annually, showcasing a stable approach. In contrast, Jazz Pharmaceuticals saw a significant increase, with expenses rising from approximately 400 million USD in 2014 to over 1.3 billion USD in 2023, marking a 230% increase.

While Johnson & Johnson's expenses remained relatively stable, Jazz Pharmaceuticals' growth in SG&A costs reflects its aggressive expansion strategy. This divergence highlights the different operational strategies of a global giant versus a rapidly growing player. Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into how companies manage operational costs in a dynamic market.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025