Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Lam Research Corporation or Jabil Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Lam vs. Jabil

__timestampJabil Inc.Lam Research Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014675730000613341000
Thursday, January 1, 2015862647000591611000
Friday, January 1, 2016924427000630954000
Sunday, January 1, 2017907702000667485000
Monday, January 1, 20181050716000762219000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191111347000702407000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201174694000682479000
Friday, January 1, 20211213000000829875000
Saturday, January 1, 20221154000000885737000
Sunday, January 1, 20231206000000832753000
Monday, January 1, 20241160000000868247000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of the semiconductor and electronics industries, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Lam Research Corporation and Jabil Inc. have demonstrated distinct strategies in optimizing these costs.

From 2014 to 2024, Jabil Inc. consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately 1.2 billion in 2021. In contrast, Lam Research Corporation maintained a more conservative approach, with expenses reaching around 886 million in 2022. This difference highlights Jabil's expansive operational strategy compared to Lam's more streamlined approach.

Interestingly, while Jabil's SG&A expenses grew by about 78% over the decade, Lam's increased by roughly 42%. This data suggests that Jabil's growth strategy might involve higher operational costs, whereas Lam focuses on efficiency. Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into how these industry leaders manage their resources.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025