Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or Perrigo Company plc

SG&A Cost Optimization: Madrigal vs. Perrigo

__timestampMadrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Perrigo Company plc
Wednesday, January 1, 201415746000675200000
Thursday, January 1, 201513392000771800000
Friday, January 1, 201692900001205500000
Sunday, January 1, 201776720001146500000
Monday, January 1, 2018152930001125800000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019226480001166100000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020218640001175500000
Friday, January 1, 2021373180001111400000
Saturday, January 1, 2022481300001210100000
Sunday, January 1, 20231081460001274600000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Perrigo Company plc have taken different paths in optimizing these costs.

From 2014 to 2023, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals saw a significant increase in SG&A expenses, rising from approximately $15.7 million to over $108 million. This represents a staggering 587% increase, reflecting their aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. In contrast, Perrigo Company plc maintained a more stable SG&A expenditure, with a modest increase of about 89% from $675 million to $1.27 billion over the same period.

While Madrigal's strategy indicates a focus on growth, Perrigo's steady approach suggests a commitment to efficiency. Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into each company's strategic priorities and operational efficiencies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025