Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Merck & Co., Inc. or Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.

Merck vs. Iovance: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampIovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.Merck & Co., Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014933577211606000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151239000010313000000
Friday, January 1, 2016256020009762000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017212620009830000000
Monday, January 1, 20182843000010102000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194084900010615000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020602100008955000000
Friday, January 1, 2021836640009634000000
Saturday, January 1, 202210409700010042000000
Sunday, January 1, 202310691600010504000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Merck & Co., Inc. and Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. have taken different paths in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Merck's SG&A expenses have shown a relatively stable trend, averaging around $10 billion annually. This consistency reflects Merck's robust operational strategies and its ability to maintain efficiency despite market fluctuations.

In contrast, Iovance Biotherapeutics, a smaller player, has seen its SG&A expenses grow significantly, from approximately $9 million in 2014 to over $100 million in 2023. This tenfold increase highlights Iovance's aggressive expansion and investment in growth. While Merck's expenses have decreased by about 10% over the period, Iovance's have surged by over 1000%, showcasing their divergent strategies in managing operational costs.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025