Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Micron Technology, Inc. or Fair Isaac Corporation

SG&A Cost Optimization: Micron vs. Fair Isaac

__timestampFair Isaac CorporationMicron Technology, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014278203000707000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015300002000719000000
Friday, January 1, 2016328940000659000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017339796000743000000
Monday, January 1, 2018380362000813000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019414086000836000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020420930000881000000
Friday, January 1, 2021396281000894000000
Saturday, January 1, 20223838630001066000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023400565000920000000
Monday, January 1, 20244628340001129000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of technology and analytics, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Micron Technology, Inc. and Fair Isaac Corporation have showcased contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2024, Micron's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 60%, peaking at $1.13 billion in 2024. In contrast, Fair Isaac's expenses grew by about 66%, reaching $462 million in the same year.

While Micron's larger scale justifies its higher absolute expenses, Fair Isaac's consistent growth in SG&A costs reflects its strategic investments in innovation and market expansion. This comparison highlights the diverse approaches companies take in managing operational costs, balancing between cost efficiency and strategic growth. As investors and analysts evaluate these trends, understanding the nuances of SG&A optimization becomes essential for predicting future financial health.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025