Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? MorphoSys AG or Mesoblast Limited

Biotech Giants: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampMesoblast LimitedMorphoSys AG
Wednesday, January 1, 2014541700009689000
Thursday, January 1, 20156537800010431000
Friday, January 1, 2016522630009618000
Sunday, January 1, 20173507200012348000
Monday, January 1, 20182741500028310241
Tuesday, January 1, 20193698300059336147
Wednesday, January 1, 202050918000159145941
Friday, January 1, 202163586000199800000
Saturday, January 1, 20225796700090225000
Sunday, January 1, 20235310700092538000
Monday, January 1, 202423626000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, MorphoSys AG and Mesoblast Limited have taken different paths in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Mesoblast Limited consistently maintained lower SG&A expenses, averaging around 47 million annually, with a notable reduction of 57% from 2015 to 2024. In contrast, MorphoSys AG saw a significant increase, peaking in 2021 with expenses nearly tripling from 2014 levels. This divergence highlights Mesoblast's strategic cost management, while MorphoSys's higher expenses may reflect aggressive growth strategies. However, the absence of 2024 data for MorphoSys suggests a potential shift or restructuring. As the biotech landscape evolves, these companies' approaches to SG&A optimization will be pivotal in determining their competitive edge.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025