Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Novartis AG or Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.

SG&A Cost Management: Novartis vs. Taro

__timestampNovartis AGTaro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141499300000091733000
Thursday, January 1, 20151424700000087644000
Friday, January 1, 20161419200000092365000
Sunday, January 1, 20171499700000085656000
Monday, January 1, 20181647100000088196000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191436900000089971000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201419700000093413000
Friday, January 1, 20211488600000091355000
Saturday, January 1, 202214253000000113676000
Sunday, January 1, 202312489000000198366000
Monday, January 1, 202412566000000218935000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Pharmaceutical Giants

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Novartis AG and Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, Novartis AG's SG&A expenses fluctuated, peaking in 2018, while Taro's expenses remained relatively stable, with a notable increase in 2023.

Novartis AG, a Swiss multinational, saw its SG&A costs decrease by approximately 17% from 2018 to 2023, indicating a strategic shift towards cost optimization. In contrast, Taro, an Israeli company, experienced a 140% rise in SG&A expenses in the same period, suggesting a potential expansion or increased operational costs.

This data highlights the diverse approaches these companies take in managing their operational expenses, reflecting broader trends in the pharmaceutical industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025