Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? NVIDIA Corporation or Manhattan Associates, Inc.

NVIDIA vs. Manhattan: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

__timestampManhattan Associates, Inc.NVIDIA Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201497072000435702000
Thursday, January 1, 201597874000480763000
Friday, January 1, 201696545000602000000
Sunday, January 1, 201793536000663000000
Monday, January 1, 2018103880000815000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019121463000991000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201092020001093000000
Friday, January 1, 20211259410001940000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221376070002166000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231556640002440000000
Monday, January 1, 20241657860002654000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. This analysis compares NVIDIA Corporation and Manhattan Associates, Inc. over a decade, from 2014 to 2024, to see who optimizes these costs better.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

NVIDIA, a leader in graphics processing, has seen its SG&A expenses grow significantly, from approximately $435 million in 2014 to an estimated $2.65 billion in 2024. This represents a sixfold increase, reflecting its aggressive expansion and investment in innovation. Meanwhile, Manhattan Associates, a supply chain solutions provider, has maintained a more conservative growth in SG&A costs, increasing by about 70% over the same period.

Strategic Insights

While NVIDIA's rapid increase in SG&A expenses might suggest a less efficient cost management strategy, it also indicates a robust investment in growth. In contrast, Manhattan Associates' steady rise in expenses highlights a more controlled approach, potentially optimizing operational efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025