Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? NVIDIA Corporation or The Trade Desk, Inc.

NVIDIA vs. The Trade Desk: SG&A Cost Strategies Compared

__timestampNVIDIA CorporationThe Trade Desk, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201443570200023975000
Thursday, January 1, 201548076300040070000
Friday, January 1, 201660200000078219000
Sunday, January 1, 2017663000000119825000
Monday, January 1, 2018815000000171981000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019991000000275930000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201093000000346359000
Friday, January 1, 20211940000000623959000
Saturday, January 1, 20222166000000863142000
Sunday, January 1, 20232440000000968248000
Monday, January 1, 202426540000001082333000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Tech Giants

In the competitive world of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, NVIDIA Corporation and The Trade Desk, Inc. have shown distinct strategies in optimizing these costs.

NVIDIA's Steady Climb

From 2014 to 2023, NVIDIA's SG&A expenses have surged by over 500%, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. By 2023, NVIDIA's expenses reached approximately 2.44 billion, a testament to its expanding operations and market dominance.

The Trade Desk's Agile Approach

Conversely, The Trade Desk, Inc. has maintained a more conservative trajectory, with SG&A expenses growing from 24 million in 2014 to nearly 968 million in 2023. This represents a significant increase, yet it remains a fraction of NVIDIA's costs, highlighting The Trade Desk's efficient cost management.

Conclusion

While NVIDIA's approach underscores its expansive growth, The Trade Desk's strategy emphasizes lean operations. Both paths offer valuable insights into cost optimization in the tech industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025