Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? NVIDIA Corporation or Zebra Technologies Corporation

NVIDIA vs. Zebra: SG&A Cost Strategies Compared

__timestampNVIDIA CorporationZebra Technologies Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014435702000351518000
Thursday, January 1, 2015480763000763025000
Friday, January 1, 2016602000000751000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017663000000749000000
Monday, January 1, 2018815000000811000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019991000000826000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201093000000787000000
Friday, January 1, 20211940000000935000000
Saturday, January 1, 20222166000000982000000
Sunday, January 1, 20232440000000915000000
Monday, January 1, 20242654000000981000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A: A Tale of Two Tech Giants

In the competitive world of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, NVIDIA Corporation and Zebra Technologies Corporation have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain.

NVIDIA's Rising SG&A Costs

From 2014 to 2023, NVIDIA's SG&A expenses have surged by over 500%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and investment in innovation. This increase, from approximately $435 million in 2014 to $2.44 billion in 2023, highlights NVIDIA's commitment to scaling its operations and market presence.

Zebra's Steady Approach

Conversely, Zebra Technologies has maintained a more stable SG&A trajectory, with expenses peaking at around $982 million in 2022. This steady approach suggests a focus on efficiency and cost control, even as the company navigates the challenges of a dynamic market.

Conclusion

While NVIDIA's strategy emphasizes growth, Zebra's approach underscores stability. Both paths offer valuable insights into optimizing SG&A costs in the tech industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025