Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? PACCAR Inc or Graco Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Graco's Stability vs. PACCAR's Volatility

__timestampGraco Inc.PACCAR Inc
Wednesday, January 1, 2014303565000561400000
Thursday, January 1, 2015324016000541500000
Friday, January 1, 2016341734000540200000
Sunday, January 1, 2017372496000555000000
Monday, January 1, 2018382988000644700000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019367743000698500000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020355796000581400000
Friday, January 1, 2021422975000676800000
Saturday, January 1, 2022404731000726300000
Sunday, January 1, 2023432156000784600000
Monday, January 1, 2024465133000585000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of industrial manufacturing, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, PACCAR Inc and Graco Inc have demonstrated distinct strategies in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2024, Graco Inc has shown a steady increase in SG&A expenses, rising approximately 53% from 2014 to 2024. In contrast, PACCAR Inc's expenses have fluctuated, peaking in 2023 before dropping by 25% in 2024. This suggests a more volatile approach, possibly reflecting strategic investments or market adaptations. While Graco Inc's consistent growth in expenses might indicate stable operations, PACCAR Inc's variability could point to dynamic market responses. Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into how these industry leaders navigate financial management, offering lessons in both stability and adaptability.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025