Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. or Galapagos NV

Biotech Giants' SG&A Strategies: Expansion vs. Efficiency

__timestampGalapagos NVProtagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201490790001860000
Thursday, January 1, 2015203090002963000
Friday, January 1, 2016169450006961000
Sunday, January 1, 20172055900011779000
Monday, January 1, 20182964100013697000
Tuesday, January 1, 20198825800015749000
Wednesday, January 1, 202016217000018638000
Friday, January 1, 202116721800027196000
Saturday, January 1, 202223952800031739000
Sunday, January 1, 20239425200033491000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining financial health. Over the past decade, Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. and Galapagos NV have demonstrated contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Galapagos NV's SG&A expenses surged by over 900%, peaking in 2022. This reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. In contrast, Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. maintained a more conservative approach, with their SG&A expenses increasing by approximately 170% over the same period. This strategic restraint may indicate a focus on operational efficiency and cost control. As the biotech industry continues to evolve, these companies' differing approaches to SG&A optimization offer valuable insights into their long-term strategic priorities and financial management practices.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025