Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Sanofi or Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Sanofi vs. Alpine Immune Sciences

__timestampAlpine Immune Sciences, Inc.Sanofi
Wednesday, January 1, 201422877098565000000
Thursday, January 1, 201568440009496000000
Friday, January 1, 201685860009592000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017607900010164000000
Monday, January 1, 201883620009934000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201994670009883000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020108990009390000000
Friday, January 1, 2021145600009555000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221796800010539000000
Sunday, January 1, 20232222200010765000000
Monday, January 1, 20249183000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals and biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. This analysis compares the SG&A cost optimization strategies of two industry players: Sanofi, a global pharmaceutical giant, and Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc., a burgeoning biotech firm.

From 2014 to 2023, Sanofi's SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, averaging around $9.8 billion annually. Despite fluctuations, their expenses have shown a modest increase of approximately 12% over the decade. In contrast, Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc. has seen a dramatic rise in SG&A costs, surging nearly tenfold from 2014 to 2023. This growth reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities.

While Sanofi's scale allows for consistent cost management, Alpine's rapid increase highlights the challenges faced by smaller firms in scaling operations efficiently. Understanding these dynamics is key for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025