Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? SAP SE or Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

SAP vs. Cadence: Who Masters SG&A Efficiency?

__timestampCadence Design Systems, Inc.SAP SE
Wednesday, January 1, 20145133070005195000000
Thursday, January 1, 20155124140006449000000
Friday, January 1, 20165203000007299000000
Sunday, January 1, 20175533420007999000000
Monday, January 1, 20185730750007879000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196214790009318000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206708850008461000000
Friday, January 1, 20217492800009936000000
Saturday, January 1, 202284634000011015000000
Sunday, January 1, 202392064900010192000000
Monday, January 1, 2024103976600010254000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Optimizing SG&A: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive world of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. From 2014 to 2023, SAP SE and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. have shown distinct strategies in optimizing these costs. SAP SE, a leader in enterprise software, consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $11 billion in 2022. This reflects their expansive global operations and investment in customer relations. In contrast, Cadence Design Systems, Inc., a key player in electronic design automation, maintained a leaner approach, with expenses growing from around $513 million in 2014 to $921 million in 2023. This 80% increase over the decade highlights their strategic focus on efficiency and innovation. As businesses navigate economic uncertainties, these insights into SG&A management offer valuable lessons in balancing growth and cost control.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025