Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? SAP SE or Corning Incorporated

SAP vs. Corning: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

__timestampCorning IncorporatedSAP SE
Wednesday, January 1, 201412110000005195000000
Thursday, January 1, 201515230000006449000000
Friday, January 1, 201614720000007299000000
Sunday, January 1, 201714670000007999000000
Monday, January 1, 201817990000007879000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201915850000009318000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202017470000008461000000
Friday, January 1, 202118270000009936000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022189800000011015000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023184300000010192000000
Monday, January 1, 2024193100000010254000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Comparative Analysis

In the competitive landscape of global business, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. This analysis delves into the SG&A cost optimization strategies of two industry giants: SAP SE and Corning Incorporated, from 2014 to 2023.

SAP SE: A Steady Climb

SAP SE, a leader in enterprise software, has seen its SG&A expenses rise steadily, peaking in 2022 with a 112% increase from 2014. This growth reflects SAP's strategic investments in expanding its global footprint and enhancing its product offerings.

Corning Incorporated: Consistent Control

Corning Incorporated, renowned for its innovations in materials science, has maintained a more consistent SG&A expense trajectory. From 2014 to 2023, Corning's expenses increased by approximately 60%, showcasing its disciplined approach to cost management.

Conclusion

While SAP SE's expenses reflect aggressive growth strategies, Corning's stable increase suggests a focus on efficiency. Missing data for 2024 indicates ongoing adjustments in their strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025