Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited or Teradyne, Inc.

TSMC vs. Teradyne: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company LimitedTeradyne, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201424020800000319713000
Thursday, January 1, 201522921900000306313000
Friday, January 1, 201625696400000315682000
Sunday, January 1, 201727169200000348287000
Monday, January 1, 201826253700000390669000
Tuesday, January 1, 201928085800000437083000
Wednesday, January 1, 202035570400000464769000
Friday, January 1, 202144488200000547559000
Saturday, January 1, 202263445300000558103000
Sunday, January 1, 202371464000000571426000
Monday, January 1, 2024968890000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive world of semiconductors, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSMC) and Teradyne, Inc. have been at the forefront of this battle since 2014. Over the past decade, TSMC has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 300%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and market dominance. In contrast, Teradyne's SG&A costs have increased by about 80%, showcasing a more conservative growth strategy.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

From 2014 to 2023, TSMC's SG&A expenses surged from around $24 billion to over $71 billion, while Teradyne's rose from $320 million to $570 million. This stark difference highlights TSMC's expansive approach compared to Teradyne's steady growth. However, the data for 2024 is incomplete, leaving room for speculation on future trends. As these companies continue to evolve, their SG&A strategies will remain pivotal in shaping their financial landscapes.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025