Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Verisk Analytics, Inc. or Rockwell Automation, Inc.

SG&A Cost Optimization: Verisk vs. Rockwell

__timestampRockwell Automation, Inc.Verisk Analytics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141570100000227306000
Thursday, January 1, 20151506400000312690000
Friday, January 1, 20161467400000301600000
Sunday, January 1, 20171591500000322800000
Monday, January 1, 20181599000000378700000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191538500000603500000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201479800000413900000
Friday, January 1, 20211680000000422700000
Saturday, January 1, 20221766700000381500000
Sunday, January 1, 20232023700000389300000
Monday, January 1, 20242002600000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Comparative Analysis

In the competitive landscape of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. This analysis delves into the SG&A cost optimization strategies of two industry giants: Verisk Analytics, Inc. and Rockwell Automation, Inc., from 2014 to 2023.

Rockwell Automation, Inc.

Rockwell Automation has consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $2 billion in 2023. Despite this, their expenses have shown a steady upward trend, reflecting a strategic investment in operational capabilities.

Verisk Analytics, Inc.

In contrast, Verisk Analytics has demonstrated a more conservative approach, with SG&A expenses averaging around $375 million. Their expenses peaked in 2019, reaching $603 million, before stabilizing in subsequent years.

Conclusion

While Rockwell Automation's higher expenses suggest a focus on growth and expansion, Verisk Analytics' strategy appears to prioritize efficiency and cost control. This comparison highlights the diverse approaches companies can take in optimizing SG&A costs.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025