Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Viking Therapeutics, Inc. or Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotech Giants: Agios vs. Viking in SG&A Cost Management

__timestampAgios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014191200001244910
Thursday, January 1, 2015359920005029636
Friday, January 1, 2016507140004846776
Sunday, January 1, 2017711240005329003
Monday, January 1, 20181141450007121000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191320340009128000
Wednesday, January 1, 202014907000010731000
Friday, January 1, 202112144500010701000
Saturday, January 1, 202212167300016121000
Sunday, January 1, 202311990300037021000
Monday, January 1, 2024156784000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. From 2014 to 2023, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Viking Therapeutics, Inc. have taken distinct paths in optimizing these costs. Agios Pharmaceuticals saw a steady increase in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2020 with a 680% rise from 2014. Meanwhile, Viking Therapeutics maintained a more conservative approach, with expenses growing by approximately 2,870% over the same period, albeit from a much smaller base. This stark contrast highlights differing strategies: Agios's aggressive expansion versus Viking's cautious scaling. As of 2023, Agios's expenses have slightly decreased, suggesting a shift towards efficiency, while Viking's costs have surged, possibly indicating a new phase of growth. Understanding these trends offers valuable insights into each company's operational priorities and market strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025