Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Viking Therapeutics, Inc. or MiMedx Group, Inc.

Biotech Giants: SG&A Cost Strategies Compared

__timestampMiMedx Group, Inc.Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014904800001244910
Thursday, January 1, 20151333840005029636
Friday, January 1, 20161799970004846776
Sunday, January 1, 20172201190005329003
Monday, January 1, 20182585280007121000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191982050009128000
Wednesday, January 1, 202018102200010731000
Friday, January 1, 202119835900010701000
Saturday, January 1, 202220878900016121000
Sunday, January 1, 202321112400037021000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better?

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, MiMedx Group, Inc. and Viking Therapeutics, Inc. have shown contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, MiMedx consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at over $258 million in 2018. In contrast, Viking Therapeutics maintained a leaner approach, with expenses rising from approximately $1.2 million in 2014 to $37 million in 2023. This represents a staggering 2,900% increase, reflecting their aggressive growth strategy. Meanwhile, MiMedx's expenses grew by about 133%, indicating a more stable expansion. These trends highlight the differing operational strategies of these companies, with MiMedx focusing on steady growth and Viking on rapid expansion. Understanding these dynamics offers valuable insights into their financial strategies and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025