Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? XPO Logistics, Inc. or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: XPO vs. Stanley Black & Decker

__timestampStanley Black & Decker, Inc.XPO Logistics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142595900000422500000
Thursday, January 1, 201524864000001113400000
Friday, January 1, 201626239000001651200000
Sunday, January 1, 201729801000001656500000
Monday, January 1, 201831717000001837000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201930410000001845000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202030896000002172000000
Friday, January 1, 202132404000001322000000
Saturday, January 1, 20223370000000678000000
Sunday, January 1, 20232829300000167000000
Monday, January 1, 20243310500000134000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of logistics and manufacturing, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, XPO Logistics, Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, Stanley Black & Decker's SG&A expenses have seen a steady increase, peaking in 2022 with a 30% rise from 2014. In contrast, XPO Logistics experienced a significant reduction in SG&A costs, dropping by nearly 60% from their 2020 peak to 2023. This divergence highlights XPO's aggressive cost-cutting measures, while Stanley Black & Decker's expenses reflect a more consistent investment in administrative functions. As businesses navigate economic uncertainties, these insights offer valuable lessons in balancing cost management with strategic growth.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025