Who Prioritizes Innovation? R&D Spending Compared for Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and ADMA Biologics, Inc.

Halozyme vs. ADMA: A Decade of R&D Investment

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014951701479696000
Thursday, January 1, 2015701594693236000
Friday, January 1, 20167688238150842000
Sunday, January 1, 20176229587150643000
Monday, January 1, 20183926120150252000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192343848140804000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020590701334236000
Friday, January 1, 2021364606035672000
Saturday, January 1, 2022361376466607000
Sunday, January 1, 2023330000076363000
Monday, January 1, 202479048000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Innovation in Biotech: A Comparative Analysis

In the ever-evolving world of biotechnology, research and development (R&D) spending is a key indicator of a company's commitment to innovation. Over the past decade, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. has consistently outpaced ADMA Biologics, Inc. in R&D investment. From 2014 to 2023, Halozyme's R&D expenses have been, on average, nearly 18 times higher than those of ADMA Biologics. This significant difference highlights Halozyme's aggressive pursuit of innovation, with peaks in 2016 and 2017 where their spending reached over $150 million annually. In contrast, ADMA Biologics' R&D spending peaked in 2014 at approximately $9.5 million, followed by a gradual decline. This disparity in investment may reflect differing strategic priorities or financial capabilities. As the biotech industry continues to grow, understanding these spending patterns provides valuable insights into each company's potential for future breakthroughs.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025