ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. or Clean Harbors, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: ZTO vs. Clean Harbors

__timestampClean Harbors, Inc.ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014437921000534537000
Thursday, January 1, 2015414164000591738000
Friday, January 1, 2016422015000705995000
Sunday, January 1, 2017456648000780517000
Monday, January 1, 20185037470001210717000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194840540001546227000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204510440001663712000
Friday, January 1, 20215379620001875869000
Saturday, January 1, 20226273910002077372000
Sunday, January 1, 20236711610002425253000
Monday, January 1, 2024739629000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: ZTO Express or Clean Harbors?

In the competitive landscape of logistics and environmental services, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. and Clean Harbors, Inc. have shown distinct trends in their SG&A management. From 2014 to 2023, ZTO Express's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 354%, reflecting its rapid expansion and market penetration. In contrast, Clean Harbors experienced a more modest increase of about 53% during the same period, indicating a more controlled cost management approach.

While ZTO Express's aggressive growth strategy is evident, Clean Harbors' steady cost control might appeal to investors seeking stability. As of 2023, ZTO's SG&A expenses are nearly 3.6 times higher than Clean Harbors, highlighting the different operational strategies of these industry players. Understanding these trends can provide valuable insights for stakeholders and investors alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025