ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. or Graco Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: ZTO vs. Graco

__timestampGraco Inc.ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014303565000534537000
Thursday, January 1, 2015324016000591738000
Friday, January 1, 2016341734000705995000
Sunday, January 1, 2017372496000780517000
Monday, January 1, 20183829880001210717000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193677430001546227000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203557960001663712000
Friday, January 1, 20214229750001875869000
Saturday, January 1, 20224047310002077372000
Sunday, January 1, 20234321560002425253000
Monday, January 1, 2024465133000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

SG&A Cost Management: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of logistics and manufacturing, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. and Graco Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2023, ZTO Express saw its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 354%, reflecting its rapid expansion in the logistics sector. In contrast, Graco Inc., a stalwart in the manufacturing industry, managed a more modest increase of around 43% over the same period.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

While ZTO Express's expenses surged, Graco Inc. maintained a steady trajectory, suggesting a more controlled approach to cost management. The data for 2024 is incomplete, but the trends are clear: ZTO's aggressive growth strategy comes with higher costs, whereas Graco's conservative approach may offer stability. Investors and analysts should consider these strategies when evaluating long-term financial health.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025