A Professional Review of EBITDA: Lam Research Corporation Compared to Teradyne, Inc.

Lam Research's EBITDA outshines Teradyne's over a decade.

__timestampLam Research CorporationTeradyne, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014977923000355804000
Thursday, January 1, 20151155224000390438000
Friday, January 1, 2016136528400068085999
Sunday, January 1, 20172218837000647992000
Monday, January 1, 20183539694000603746000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192774013000650398000
Wednesday, January 1, 202029423270001036119000
Friday, January 1, 202147891740001291304000
Saturday, January 1, 20225715561000954200000
Sunday, January 1, 20235637608000640495000
Monday, January 1, 20244905157000593788000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

A Comparative Analysis of EBITDA: Lam Research vs. Teradyne

In the ever-evolving semiconductor industry, understanding financial health is crucial. Over the past decade, Lam Research Corporation has consistently outperformed Teradyne, Inc. in terms of EBITDA, a key indicator of operational profitability. From 2014 to 2023, Lam Research's EBITDA grew by approximately 476%, peaking in 2022. In contrast, Teradyne's EBITDA saw a more modest increase of around 168% during the same period, with its highest value in 2021. This disparity highlights Lam Research's robust growth strategy and market positioning. Notably, 2024 data for Teradyne is missing, suggesting potential reporting delays or strategic shifts. As the semiconductor landscape continues to shift, these financial insights provide a window into the competitive dynamics between these two industry giants.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025