Cost of Revenue Comparison: Lam Research Corporation vs Teradyne, Inc.

Lam vs. Teradyne: A Decade of Cost Evolution

__timestampLam Research CorporationTeradyne, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142599828000769016000
Thursday, January 1, 20152974976000723935000
Friday, January 1, 20163266971000793683000
Sunday, January 1, 20174410261000912734000
Monday, January 1, 20185911966000880408000
Tuesday, January 1, 20195295100000955136000
Wednesday, January 1, 202054360430001335728000
Friday, January 1, 202178208440001496225000
Saturday, January 1, 202293552320001287894000
Sunday, January 1, 202396515910001139550000
Monday, January 1, 202478525950001170953000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

A Decade of Cost Dynamics: Lam Research vs. Teradyne

In the ever-evolving semiconductor industry, cost efficiency is paramount. Over the past decade, Lam Research Corporation and Teradyne, Inc. have showcased contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, Lam Research's cost of revenue surged by approximately 271%, peaking in 2023. This reflects their aggressive expansion and scaling strategies. In contrast, Teradyne's cost of revenue grew by about 48% over the same period, indicating a more conservative approach.

Lam Research's costs consistently outpaced Teradyne's, with 2023 figures showing Lam's costs nearly 8.5 times higher. This disparity highlights differing business models and market strategies. Notably, 2024 data for Teradyne is missing, suggesting potential reporting delays or strategic shifts. As the semiconductor landscape continues to shift, these cost trends offer valuable insights into each company's operational priorities and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025