A Professional Review of EBITDA: Thomson Reuters Corporation Compared to Hubbell Incorporated

Thomson Reuters vs. Hubbell: A Decade of EBITDA Insights

__timestampHubbell IncorporatedThomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20145947000004289000000
Thursday, January 1, 20155336000003151000000
Friday, January 1, 20165647000002999000000
Sunday, January 1, 20175856000001495930891
Monday, January 1, 20186775000001345686008
Tuesday, January 1, 20197409000001913474675
Wednesday, January 1, 20206714000002757000000
Friday, January 1, 20216610000001994296441
Saturday, January 1, 20228543000003010000000
Sunday, January 1, 202311697000002950000000
Monday, January 1, 20241291200000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

A Decade of EBITDA: Thomson Reuters vs. Hubbell

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, understanding a company's financial health is crucial. EBITDA, or Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization, serves as a key indicator of operational performance. Over the past decade, Thomson Reuters Corporation and Hubbell Incorporated have showcased contrasting EBITDA trajectories.

From 2014 to 2023, Thomson Reuters experienced a significant decline of approximately 31% in EBITDA, dropping from a peak in 2014 to a more modest figure in 2023. In contrast, Hubbell Incorporated demonstrated a robust growth of nearly 97% over the same period, culminating in a record high in 2023. This divergence highlights the dynamic nature of these industries, with Hubbell's consistent upward trend reflecting strategic growth and operational efficiency.

As investors and analysts look to the future, these trends offer valuable insights into the resilience and adaptability of these corporate giants.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025