Comparative EBITDA Analysis: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Builders FirstSource, Inc.

Thomson Reuters vs. Builders FirstSource: A Decade of EBITDA Insights

__timestampBuilders FirstSource, Inc.Thomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014600080004289000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151488970003151000000
Friday, January 1, 20163461290002999000000
Sunday, January 1, 20173780960001495930891
Monday, January 1, 20184668740001345686008
Tuesday, January 1, 20194923440001913474675
Wednesday, January 1, 20206604200002757000000
Friday, January 1, 202129347760001994296441
Saturday, January 1, 202242673460003010000000
Sunday, January 1, 202327345940002950000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

A Decade of EBITDA: Thomson Reuters vs. Builders FirstSource

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, the financial health of companies is often gauged by their EBITDA—Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2023, Thomson Reuters Corporation and Builders FirstSource, Inc. have showcased contrasting trajectories in their EBITDA performance.

Thomson Reuters: A Steady Giant

Thomson Reuters, a stalwart in the information services sector, maintained a robust EBITDA, peaking in 2014 with a notable 4.3 billion. Despite fluctuations, it consistently hovered around the 3 billion mark, reflecting its stable market position.

Builders FirstSource: A Meteoric Rise

Conversely, Builders FirstSource, a key player in the construction industry, experienced a staggering growth of over 7,000% from 2014 to 2022. This surge underscores its aggressive expansion and strategic market positioning.

This comparative analysis highlights the diverse strategies and market dynamics influencing these industry leaders.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025